Friday mystery object #93

This Friday I’m giving you a mystery object that’s on display at the Horniman Museum:

[EDIT length = 8.5cm]

Any idea what this skull is from?

As usual, you can put your suggestions, comments and questions below and I’ll do my best to answer. Good luck!

32 thoughts on “Friday mystery object #93

    • PaoloViscardi's avatar

      It’s hard to include a scale when the specimen is on display – that’s my excuse! I should’ve included the length above, which I will now do!

  1. Will Chapman's avatar

    A mixture of sharp teeth and grinding molars suggests an insectivore. Visibility of the surface texture of background material suggests the skull is quite small. Not a hedgehog as it has over hanging front teeth – suggest a shrew or mole

    • PaoloViscardi's avatar

      Certainly an insect eater (amongst other things) skull is about 8.5cm long and you’re right that it’s not a hedgehog, but it’s not a shrew or mole either…

    • Will Chapman's avatar

      Bandicoot – that is an interesting thought. At first I dismissed it because my knowledge of bandicoots comes from when I lived in India where they are quite common and my recollection was that they didn’t have a long snout.

      But my friend google tells me that there is an australian marsupial species of bandicoot which does appear to have a long snout.

      • Stephen J Henstridge's avatar

        Yes, I thinking of the Australian/Papua New Guinean/West Irian Bandicoots. I guess I could have been a little more verbose. Actually, I don’t think they are found in India. Anyway, dental plan seems to match (5/3, 1/1, 3/3, 4/4).

  2. carlos grau's avatar

    What a beautiful skull, so elegant!
    It’s an insect-eating mammal, but the incisors make it look like insects are not its only diet. Also, the front of the snout (again, not very technical terms!) suggest a wiggly, inquisitive nose…

  3. cromercrox's avatar

    We’ve had tenrecs before… I did think Solenodon, with that size, but I checked and the skulls look quite different. Desmans, too, look rather different. Following Jack’s clue I thought … hmmm … elephant shrew. But it’s not that either. Sticking my long whiffly nose in further, it does look, however, very like a long-nosed bandicoot (Perameles nasuta).

  4. Jamie Revell's avatar

    I’m coming crashing into this remarkably late, for once. Obviously the length of the skull is significant, but the other thing I notice is that it does seem to have rather a lot of incisors, suggesting its a marsupial.

    Which one, though? Well, in the tradition of subtle yet somehow quite awful clues, I’ll put this one in the bag beside the badgers, and stare pointedly at the rather long nose.

  5. Jack Ashby's avatar

    For those wanting to easily spot a marsupial skull without having to learn dental formulae – the inward pointing flange on the bottom of the back end of the mandible, and the presence of the lacrimal foramen (the tiny hole for nerves and blood vessels near the from of the orbit) OUTSIDE the orbit are marsupial characteristics.
    If placental have mandibular flanges they point downwards not inwards, and the lacrimal foramen is INSIDE a placental orbit.

  6. Will Chapman's avatar

    OK, having had three guesses I’ve read the clues and one continent that is ‘thousands’ of miles away from Madagascar is South America home of a load of opossums.

    So looking at the wide choice – other clues are 8.5 cm skull, long snout – suggests a Philander opossum?
    http://tinyurl.com/44ykczv

  7. Richard's avatar

    I’m a bit too thick to join in, but still enjoy reading the comments.
    Maybe next weeks will be about something I know about

Leave a reply to carlos grau Cancel reply