Science communication is something I consider to be important, because I consider science to be important.
Our understanding of reality may be shaped by many things, but to me there seems to be no justification in basing our understanding on something that is not observably and demonstrably real. Science provides a framework within which we can test ideas of reality against one another and, more importantly against real evidence, to find which ideas are the most robust.
I work at the Horniman Museum in South East London, where we are dedicated to providing researchers and the wider public with access to objects that provide evidence to inform their understanding of the world in which they live. Part of my role as a curator is to provide interpretation of what we can be learned from natural history objects. That’s part of the reason why I set up this blog.
N.B. I should probably make it explicitly clear that this blog is personal and in no way represents the views and opinions of the Horniman Museum.