Science communication is something I consider to be important, because I consider science to be important.

Our understanding of reality may be shaped by many things, but to me there seems to be no justification in basing our understanding on something that is not observably and demonstrably real. Science provides a framework within which we can test ideas of reality against one another and, more importantly against real evidence, to find which ideas are the most robust.

I work at the at the Horniman Museum Grant Museum of Zoology in London National Museum of Ireland, where we are dedicated to providing researchers and the wider public with access to objects that provide evidence to inform their understanding of the world in which they live. Part of my role as a curator is to provide interpretation of what we can be learned from natural history objects. That’s part of the reason why I set up this blog.

I never really thought about my role in this light until Alom Shaha asked me to answer the question “Why is science important?”. My answer can be seen below (apologies for the low volume).

N.B. I should probably make it explicitly clear that this blog is personal and in no way represents the views and opinions of the Horniman Museum Grant Museum of Zoology in London National Museum of Ireland.