Friday mystery object #337 answer

Last week I gave you this largely amorphous blob to have a go at identifying:


Perhaps unsurprisingly it proved quite tricky, with most people opting for a brain, heart or gland of some kind. However, believe it or not, this is actually a whole animal.

In the comments a close suggestion came from palfreyman1414 who said:

“…invasive crab lip parasitical crustacean isolated…”

Tony Irwin clearly knew the actual answer with a nicely crafted cryptic link to the two common sequential hosts of this animal, the Flounder and the Cod. Meanwhile, on Twitter there were another couple of suggestions – one was a good general biological principle:

The other was a straight-up correct answer from Dr Ross Piper, an old zoological buddy from postgrad days and an aficionado of odd animals:

This is indeed a Codworm or Lernaeocera branchialis (Linnaeus, 1767) a type of copepod parasite that has a life history in which they spend part of their mobile larval stage parasitising flounders (and similar fish that sit around a lot) until they’re able to mate, at which point the fertilised female seeks out one of the mobile gadoid fish (the Cod family), where she gets into the gills and plumbs herself in to the Cod’s blood supply right at the heart, with her egg sacs at the gills and protected by the operculum (gill covers). She then spends the rest of her life sustained by fish blood, releasing eggs into the water and looking like a black pudding being eaten by maggots. Now those are life goals.

Digital StillCamera

Adult female Codworm in Whiting gills. Image by Hans Hillewaert, 2006

4 thoughts on “Friday mystery object #337 answer

  1. Yee-haa – I got crustacean! Crustacean is a species, right? Like insect, or bacteria? I frequently see popular science articles saying things like “crustacean/insect/bacterial/plant biomass x times greater than human, so humans should be humble”. I know that science writers can’t be so stupid as to compare apples with oranges – they can’t fool me: plantlife is a common name for the species including all its greeny chlorophyllous races, panflora promoronicus.

    • Further to my comment, and more seriously, I understand that these animals have nothing akin to the chitinous exoskeletons and limbs we associate with arthropods so there copepod/crustacean affinity is known by what? Embryology presumably?

      Also that their behaviour in their host is almost fungal, with branching “myceliæ” getting deep into the hosts system in search of nutrients while the main body sits near the outside?

      I only came close in my guess through having read about them in Colin Tudge’s wonderful, but already hugely dated “The Variety of Life”, one of the most fascinating popular-science books I possess. I re-read sections of it on a regular basis. One day I hope to graduate to reading dictionaries for pleasure…

Share your thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s