Friday mystery object #80

After last week’s anthropological object, I thought I’d give you a bit of a challenge:

Any idea what this is?

As usual you can put your suggestions, comments and questions below and I’ll do my best to answer. Good luck!

24 thoughts on “Friday mystery object #80

    • It’s certainly an odd-looking one, with its flattened profile and lack of anything in the way of a centrum presumably being significant. My guess would be an atlas vertebra (or at least one from the neck), and, as for animal group, I’d suggest a turtle, and a pretty big one at that.

      Beyond that, I’m not really sure; there are a number of turtles that would be in roughly this size range. One tends to think of sea turtles when you think large… but I’m fairly sure some of the bigger freshwater ones would be in this size range, as well.

  1. I’m thinking it’s a cervical vertebra to a side-necked turtle, for a number of reasons, but the clincher is because it’s asymmetrical.
    Most of the side-necked turtles are from Australia, South America, and Africa. Since the collection you pull most of your unusual specimens from often has an African species, I’d venture a guess that this turtle’s from Africa. Just a guess though. This bone made be wonder what cross-sections of all the os penises of the world would look like. Are they solid, or do they have ventricles and holes?

    • This reasoning would be spot-on if this were a vertebra, but it’s not!

      As to bacula, they are solid, sometimes with a urethral groove, but not always. They tend to have quite a range of cross-sectional shapes that are species specific, so they can provide useful characters for identification.

  2. My first thought was a large chondrichthyan skull – sawfish maybe?- , but it does seem a bit bony. But then, it looks a bit like an anterior view of a sectioned pelvis of something like a rhino, but that would make the ring in the centre a bit odd for a section of caudal vertebra, particularly as you say it’s not vertebrae. Close?

    • Narwhal tusks are upper left incisors with a twist, so they would indeed look asymmetrical. However, although they have a central pulp cavity, they don’t have the extra bits.

      So not a unicorn.

    • I looked at pictures earlier today of a hammerhead shark skull and I don’t think it is a hammerhead shark because the bone looks too heavy and thick and not like cartilage. The nose bits don’t seem to go through the middle of the skull on a hammerhead shark either.

Share your thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s