Last week I gave you a unfairly tricky mystery object:
My excuse for the poor photography and lack of scale was the fact I was preoccupied with the epic NatSCA conference (whose hashtag is still yielding some great photos and thoughts if you want to see what it was all about).
It probably doesn’t help that this specimen is missing the toes from its right foot, because it makes it hard to tell if the two toes on its left are the natural state for the bird, or if one toe just happens to be missing. This is an important distinction, as picked up on by sallie reynolds, since a bird with two forward-facing toes will have two rear-facing toes, which is a condition known as zygodactyly and it helps narrow down the possible group of birds it belongs to.
As it turns out, the left foot is intact and the specimen does have the zygodactyl toe arrangement, so it will be from one of nine possible groups (owls, ospreys, parrots, cuckoos, cuckoo-rollers, mousebirds, turacos, some swifts and most woodpeckers and their relatives). The bill makes it pretty clear that this isn’t an owl, osprey, parrot, mousebird, or swift. The big head narrows it down further – more than enough for Wouter van Gestel to identify that it’s a Barbet (in Dutch “Baardvogel” or bearded bird), but it doesn’t really provide enough information to get a species identification.
As it turns out, the taxonomy of the existing identification was more than a little out of date, with the label from 1881 reading Heliobucco bonapartii. Now Heliobucco has not been used as a valid genus for at least 100 years, but fortunately the species name indicates that it was named after Bonaparte (not the Emperor, but a French ornithologist who did happen to be the Napoleon’s nephew). This meant that the fantastic Eponym Dictionary of Birds by Beolens, Watkins & Grayson was able to yield the information I was after. The valid name is now Gymnobucco bonapartei Hartlaub, 1854 which is the Grey-throated Barbet.
My apologies for setting such a tricky object – I promise to try harder to make it easier next week!
We like it difficult. Glad you enjoyed Nat SCA.
That conference looks very interesting. I’ll keep in mind that a cryptic reference to the Dutch name of a species may not be very helpful on a forum where I may be the only Dutchman 😉
ik ben een zoon van Sambeek door erfgoed, maar spreek niet
As you said, Wouter, cryptic. If both of you start doing it, it’ll be double Dutch to me.
Very interesting. I had heard of barbets but forgot all about them, and wouldn’t have put this one, with its broad beak, among the piciformes, shows you how much I know! I was thinking frogmouth until Paolo wrote that my thought on zygodactyly was correct. then I knew it wasn’t frogmouth, and gave up. Good one! Hard is good.
PS Isn’t the keel shape rather pici like?
Indeed, and that is not surprising since the barbets (Capitonidae) belong to the Piciformes