Friday mystery object #343

Last week I had the good fortune to visit the collections of the Ulster Museum in Belfast with the National Museums Northern Ireland’s Curator of Vertebrates Angela Ross. It’s always a valuable experience seeing other museum stores and it was a real pleasure to meet Angela and talk about our shared experiences with collections. 

As you might expect, as with every museum in the world, there are one or two specimens that have lost labels or that have never been identified, so I was fortunate enough to be get some photos of one such example for today’s mystery object. Any idea what this skull was from?

It has similarities to specimens I’ve featured in the past, and in the answers to those I’ve provided links to identification resources. If you have a rough idea of what this is, it may be worth your while using the search box in the top right corner of the blog to look for more information to help you narrow it down.

Have fun hunting for an identification – I know I will!

16 thoughts on “Friday mystery object #343

  1. A certain central African nocturnal tree-dwelling feliform that was once grouped with others that share a similar name but is now its own family.

  2. I’m wondering if, based on the auditory bullæ (of course, dahling, you wouldn’t expect any less of me surely?) if this is related to the Abyssinian thingy you spent hours checking on from a complicated table of characteristics across 27 species…

    If you think I’m competent to do similar for this one, you must think Christmas has come early. (As someone said on fb – “I’m so excited! Only four more Brexit Secretaries until Christmas!”)

      • For what it’s worth, Paolo, I cannot get to that matrix from my phone. So now I have a legitimate excuse for not being hubristic enough to try for a specific name/id.

        Wipes forehead. Sotto voce “phew!”

  3. I thought this looked really familiar, and like James, thought maybe racoon, but looking at that tiny little molar, found it to be felineish, so now have no idea. I agree with Sally, this ruler was a little confusing. I guess I am used to metric rulers that are in mm, not cm, or at least are labelled cm. But, now that you have cleared that up, I will no longer wonder.

  4. Kind of like an ocelot, but seems to have more teeth, and those zygomatic arches are fisher-like, but a lot heavier than my specimen. Great skull.

  5. Well, I’m quite confident it is a placental mammal (tooth count is wrong in more than one way for a marsupial! And, of course, there is no inflected flange at the rear of the denture.). Can’t think of any plausible alternative to its being a Carnivoran. Beyond that… I don’t think I am good enough to distinguish feliform from caniform auditory bullae from the outside, but I don’t SEE any division into two parts… The presence of a (vestigial) third upper molar suggests it is not a dog (Canada), let alone a cat (Felidae), but belongs to one of the less prominent families… Let me go away and think…

  6. Ummm…. Reduction of the molar row — i.e. loss of third molars — seems to be universal in Feliforms: anyway, I’ve found dental formulas on the web that don’t show a third molar in Felidae, Veverridae, Herpestidae or even the very basal whatever-its-family-name is Nandinia. (But I suppose there might be rare atavistic individuals? Are civets with third molars like horses with side toes?)
    And, as I said, I don’t SEE anything on the outside of the bullae to suggest a septum. So I’m currently guessing something Caniform. I think dogs, bears, and weasels have all lost the third upper molars. So I think my next step will be look for skull images of Procyonids and Red Pandas.

  7. I was just leafing through Mammal Remains From Archeological Sites by Stanley J. Olson, and his drawings show Felis onca, F. pardalis and Lynx rufus , all have that tiny molar, but he indicates that it is really a M 1.

  8. I’m utterly ashamed of myself. The (upper) carnassial is, as I know perfectly well, P4, but it’s SO much bigger and more elaborate than the anterior premolars that I’m afraid I thought of it as a molar. Which threw my count off. The vestigial little nubbin is M2, not M3. There is no M3. So: Feloidea is back in contention. As are Mustelidae and Procyonidae. I hang my head in shame.

    So. No third molar, and second molar reduced to a nub. This is, I take it, a thoroughly CARNIVOROUS Carnivoran.

Leave a Reply to Allen Hazen Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s