Friday mystery object #492 answer

Last week I gave you this chunky chewer to try and identify:

It wasn’t the easiest challenge, since it’s clearly a rodent, and rodents are the most diverse Order of mammals, with over two thousand species. Not only that, but this specimen is badly faded – if you’re a regular reader of my blog you’ll know that’s a recurring theme for specimens from the Dead Zoo, due to the natural light that illuminated the space for over a century and a half.

However, to get started it’s worth taking a look at the size and overall shape of the specimen:

It has a shortish tail, short legs and a fairly long and cylindrical body. It also has tiny eyes, tiny ears, and incisors that protrude beyond the lips. These are all features that are common to rodents that have evolved to have a specialist fossorial (or burrowing) lifestyle, where digging is done with the teeth and usually it’s a way of getting to plant roots and tubers growing underground.

The obvious examples of rodents with a lifestyle matching this would be species like Gophers, the Naked Mole-rat, the somewhat-related blesmols (a group of African Mole-rats), the unrelated Blind Mole-rats and some of their relatives in the Family Spalacidae. All of these similar looking animals have converged on a body form that works for their way of life, but there is a key feature to help work out which of these groups of fossorial rodents to look at – the size.

Many burrowers (and most rodents in general) tend to be on the smaller side, but this specimen is around 50cm long – and that’s not including its tail. It may not quite be up there with rodent giants like the Capybara, but you could certainly consider it to be a fossorial rodent of an unusual size.

Hopefully, that should be all the additional information needed to narrow this species down to the Large Bamboo Rat Rhizomys sumatrensis (Raffles, 1821), a possible inspiration for Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s mention of the Giant Rat of Sumatra (which I suspect in turn may have influenced William Goldman in his creation of the R.O.U.S.’s in the Princess Bride).

The Large Bamboo Rat feeds mainly, and perhaps unsurprisingly, on bamboo roots. They do also take other food, such as the roots of other plants and sometimes fruit and nuts that they find when on the surface, since they are less fussy about emerging from underground than some of the more dedicatedly fossorial rodents.

Of course, by emerging it does make them more likey to be eaten by predators, and given their large size, humans count in that number. However, one interesting thing to note about this species from Southeast Asia is that they are known to carry a bacterium that can be particularly problematic for people with immunodeficiency issues, particularly HIV/AIDS, so eating them can have its problems.

I hope you enjoyed the challenge!

Friday mystery object #459 answer

Last week I gave you this guest mystery object from Andy Taylor:

Image by Andy Taylor, 2023

Those paired incisors and the large diastema (or gap) behind them are characteristic of a rodent, so that narrows down the possible options by not very much, since there are well over 2250 species.

However, this specimen also has a very large infraorbital canal (that big forward-facing hole in front of the eye socket), which is a feature of the hystricomorphs – the group containing capybaras, porcupines, chinchillas, guinea pigs, hutias and suchlike. The teeth are an additional give-away for the group, with their discrete little patterns on the grinding surfaces:

Image by Andy Taylor, 2023
Image by Andy Taylor, 2023

The scale of this specimen threw me a little at first, as I’m used to dealing with metric, but this scalebar has 16 subdivisions, so it muct be imperial. Which really helps, as it means this skull is quite large for a rodent – somewhere in the region of 5 inches or 12.7cm. That immediately narrows things down a lot more.

An additional clue is in the narrow skull profile:

Image by Andy Taylor, 2023

A lot of rodents have a lower and broader skull and this kind of shape is what I expect to see from a species that moves through dense undergrowth rather than climbing, digging or swimming. This, combined with all the other clues, led me to the agoutis.

There are 12 species of agouti, so we’re still not quite there with the identification. Most species that I can find comparative material for have a significantly longer rostrum than this specimen (relative to the rest of the skull), but there are some species I’ve not been able to find a really reliable reference skull to compare against.

There is one species where I couldn’t find a great skull comparison, but which appears in living individuals to have a relatively short snout and the skull image I could find also appears to be less nasally advantaged than most agoutis. That was the Brazilian or Red-rumped Agiouti Dasyprocta leporina (Linnaeus, 1758).

I’d be keen to take a further look with some good quality reference material, but I’m reasonably happy with this. The advantage of good comparative material is that it really helps make those detailed observations about particular shapes and sizes that can be hard to properly recognise from a photo.

In a strange, but very welcome cooincidence, I had the good fortune to meet up with Andy last Friday evening. I was at the NatSCA conference in the UK – which was held just a short journey from where Andy lives. It offered a great chance to chat with a fellow bone geek and natural history fanatic and I hope to have some more guest objects from Andy and his amazing collection in the future!